Allowed

Md. Imran Alam @ Imran Alam v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC8 Apr 2021CRM/690/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single Judge criminal court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case under Sections 413/120B IPC regarding seized money. The court held detention unwarranted at the investigation's nascent stage and fixed conditions for bail.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for anticipatory bail allowed subject to execution of security bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and conditions regarding meetings and passport deposit.

Md. Imran Alam @ Imran Alam Vs State of West Bengal — Anticipatory Bail | Calcutta HC (2021)

¶1

08.04.2021	CRM 690 of 2021
Court No.28	(Via Video Conference)
Item 1 sg	In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Park Street Police Station Case No. 193 of 2020 dated 19.10.2020 under Sections 413/120B of the Indian Penal Code.
Allowed	Md. Imran Alam alias Imran Alam Versus The State of West Bengal
	Mr. Saurav Chatterjee, Adv. Mr. Saurav Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Somnath De, Adv. …for the Petitioner.
	Mr. Madhusudan Sur, APP Mr. Dipankar Paramanick, Adv. …for the State.

¶2

The learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been implicated in this case pursuant to the seizure made in respect of Rs.1,62,45,200/along with some articles. The learned Advocate further submits that there are no allegations of cheating or receiving of any theft articles but on the basis of suo motu cognizance the present case was registered.

¶3

Mr. Sur, learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the seizure list as also certain investigation being carried out in respect of the laptop which has been seized.

¶4

We have perused the case diary and we find that the investigation is at the nascent stage and communications have been made to the concerned authorities for verifying the authenticity. We further find that the information has also sent to the Income Tax Department to take appropriate action.

¶5

In view of the steps taken by the investigating agency till date and the materials which have been surfaced in the investigation, prima facie we are of the opinion that custodial detention of the petitioner at this stage is unwarranted. The

¶6

¶7

prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed.

¶8

Accordingly, in the event of arrest, the petitioner will be enlarged on bail on furnishing security bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner shall meet the investigating officer of the case twice a week on and from 12^th April, 2021 until further orders. The petitioner shall deposit his passport (if any) with the investigating officer of the case and the same may be released after obtaining permission from the jurisdictional Magistrate. In the event the petitioner does not possess the passport, an affidavit to that extent should be filed before the investigating officer.

¶9

The prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed.

¶10

CRM 690 of 2021 is, thus, disposed of.

¶11

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)

Md. Imran Alam @ Imran Alam v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Imran Alam @ Imran Alam v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rabindra Narayan Roy and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal

tumpa sardar @tuki and Anr. Vs State of West Bengal

Mithun Sardar and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal

Mizanur Rahman @Sk Mizanur Vs State of West Bengal

Ajibar Sardar Vs State of West Bengal

Mohammed Ayub Vs State of West Bengal