Allowed

Md. Almgir Mondal @ Alamgir Mondal @ Alam v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC9 Apr 2021CRM/718/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed the application for anticipatory bail to the petitioner charged with murder and abetment. Custodial detention was deemed unwarranted; bail was granted with specific conditions including a fine, sureties, and periodic meetings with the Investigating Officer.

What did the court decide?

Application for anticipatory bail allowed subject to furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with sureties and compliance with conditions including periodic meeting with the Investigating Officer.

Md. Almgir Mondal @ Alamgir Mondal @ Alam Vs… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Calcutta HC (2021)

¶1

09.04.2021 SL No.258 Court No.28 (gc) (Allowed)

¶2

CRM 718 of 2021 (Via video Conference)

¶3

In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed in connection with Naihati Police Station Case No.412/2020 dated 09.09.2020 under Sections 448/306/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶4

And

¶5

In the matter of : Md. Alamgir Mondal @ Alamgir Mondal @ Alam

¶6

Petitioner

¶7

Mr. Sumanta Chakraborty,

¶8

… For the Petitioner. Mr. P.K. Datta, Ld. A.P.P., Mr. Santanu Deb Roy,

¶9

… For the State.

¶10

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent of the charges and has been falsely implicated in the instant case.

¶11

Learned Counsel for the State, however, opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and produces the case diary and draws the attention of this Court to the statement of witnesses as well as the postmortem report.

¶12

We have perused the materials available in the case diary and we find that there are some statements which, prima facie, may reveal charges of abetment but on a cumulative assessment of the case, we are of the opinion that custodial detention of the petitioner may not be warranted for the said purpose. Accordingly the prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed.

¶13

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local,

¶14

¶15

to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The petitioner shall not enter the jurisdiction of the Naihati Police Station except for meeting the Investigating Officer and/or attending the Court. It is also directed that the petitioner shall meet the Investigating Officer of the case once in a week until further order.

¶16

Violation of any of the conditions would result in cancellation of the bail by the learned Magistrate without further reference to this Court.

¶17

With the aforesaid observation, the application for anticipatory bail, being CRM No.718 of 2021, is, thus, disposed of.

¶18

All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶19

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)

Md. Almgir Mondal @ Alamgir Mondal @ Alam v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Almgir Mondal @ Alamgir Mondal @ Alam v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mizanur Rahman @Sk Mizanur Vs State of West Bengal

Md. Imran Alam @ Imran Alam Vs State of West Bengal

Ajibar Sardar Vs State of West Bengal

Anil Chandra Sahoo@ Anil Kumar Sahoo Vs State of West Bengal

Taiyara Khatun @ Tamina Khatun Anb Another Vs State of West Bengal

Babar Ali Mondal Vs State of West Bengal