Bhanudas S/O Shriram Uttarwar v. the State of Maharashtra and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Mass adjournment ('paucity') order — Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench; coram Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi & Hiten S. Venegavkar, JJ.; dated 12 March 2026. Large batch of writ petitions (including Nos. 7755, 10321, 10326, 261, 593, 1567, the 12301–12317 cluster, 15567 of 2025; Nos. 610, 1344, 1505, 1584, 1935 of 2026; 8518 of 2010; 14890 of 2023; 13843 of 2025, inter alia) and PIL Nos. 86 of 2012, 147 of 2014 and 71 of 2024, with numerous attached civil applications, adjourned to dates 22.07.2026–31.07.2026; interim relief/undertakings/statements, if any, to continue till next date; no substantive adjudication; no party or advocate names given ('Appearances as per board'); closes with signature lines '(Hiten S. Venegavkar, J.)' and '(Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, J.)'.
What did the court decide?
Matters adjourned to scheduled dates (22.07.2026 to 31.07.2026); continuation of interim relief / undertaking / statement, if any, till next date.