Latif Imamkhan Pathan v. the State of Maharashtra through the Principal Secretory and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench adjournment order dated 19 January 2026; WRIT PETITION NO. 57 OF 2025 — Raviraj Natthu Pagar versus The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Principal Secretary And Others; coram Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi and Hiten S. Venegavkar, JJ. Matters adjourned 'due to paucity of time' to dates shown as 01.04.2026, 02.04.2026, 06.04.2026 and 08.04.2026; interim relief / undertaking / statement, if any, to continue till next date. Purely procedural record: no arguments, statutes, precedents, issues or holdings; not suitable for merit-based citation.
What did the court decide?
Purely procedural batch adjournment: Writ Petition No. 57 of 2025, among the listed matters, adjourned due to paucity of time to dates in April 2026, and any interim relief / undertaking / statement operating in these matters ordered to continue till the next date. No substantive relief granted or denied.