Bhanudas S/O Shriram Uttarwar v. the State of Maharashtra and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Batch 'paucity of time' adjournment order of the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, coram Manish Pitale and Y. G. Khobragade, JJ., dated 29-07-2025. Covers a long schedule of writ petitions (2015–2025) and PILs adjourned to September 2025 dates (02.09.2025–19.09.2025), with some matters flagged 'Urgent Admission category'/'Due Admission category'. State represented by Government Pleader/AGPs (Girase, Ghayal, Tambe, Sonpawale, Kagne, Ingale, Joshi, Kamble, Hange). Operative directions limited to removal of office objections, filing of reply/rejoinder affidavits and continuation of existing ad-interim orders. No statute, precedent, framed issue, merits holding or monetary quantum appears; not suitable for citation on substantive law.
What did the court decide?
Adjournment of all listed matters to the dates mentioned in the schedule; office objections to be removed and affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, to be filed on or before the next date; ad-interim orders, if any passed earlier, to continue until the next date.