Kiran Raosaheb Bade and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Paucity-of-time adjournment order dated 23.01.2026, Bombay High Court Aurangabad Bench, bench of Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi and Hiten S. Venegavkar, JJ. Numerous matters - writ petitions (WP Nos. 428/2024 onwards), PIL No. 55/2024, Criminal PIL No. 12/2020, Family Court Appeals (Nos. 4/2009, 17/2009, 70/2025, 71/2025, 1/2024), Civil Applications and Income Tax Appeals Nos. 43/2016 and 79/2016 - adjourned to 16.04.2026, 17.04.2026, 18.04.2026, 20.04.2026, 21.04.2026, 22.04.2026 and 23.04.2026; interim relief/undertakings/statements to continue till next date. Purely administrative; no parties, statutes, precedents, issues or holdings.
What did the court decide?
Purely administrative adjournment order: a large batch of listed matters (writ petitions, public interest litigations, criminal public interest litigation, family court appeals, civil applications and income tax appeals, board serial nos. 954-1043) adjourned due to paucity of time to dates printed between 16.04.2026 and 23.04.2026; any interim relief / undertaking / statement already in force in these matters directed to continue till the next date.