Pradip Prakash Chavan and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court, Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction, 21.01.2025; bench: Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge and Justice Rajesh S. Patil. Paucity-of-time listing order: office objections to be removed within two weeks; ad-interim/interim orders continue subject to compliance; replies/rejoinders before next date; matters Serial Nos. 31-123 relisted 04.02.2025 to 26.02.2025 (Fresh Admission, Urgent Admission, Urgent Orders, Due Admission). Useful only for tracking hearing dates and confirming continued interim-order protection; contains no merits ruling, no named litigants, no statutory or precedent citations.
What did the court decide?
Purely administrative listing pronouncement: previously granted ad-interim/interim orders continue subject to removal of office objections within two weeks and filing of affidavits in reply/rejoinder before the next date; the listed matters (Serial Nos. 31-123 as tabulated) are carried forward to hearing dates between 04.02.2025 and 26.02.2025 across Fresh Admission, Urgent Admission, Urgent Orders and Due Admission categories. No legal issue was adjudicated.