Nitu Balkishan @ Sachin Sharma v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court common listing/adjournment order dated 20.01.2025 (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction; Ghuge & Patil, JJ.): hearings deferred due to paucity of time; office objections to be removed within two weeks; ad-interim/interim orders, if any, to continue; reply/rejoinder affidavits to be filed before next date; matters relisted 06.02.2025-27.02.2025 under Fresh Admissions, Urgent Admissions, Urgent Orders and Due Admissions categories. No parties, advocates, statutes or precedents are named; useful only as a procedural reference.
What did the court decide?
Hearing of the listed matters postponed for want of time and the matters relisted category-wise between 06.02.2025 and 27.02.2025; ad-interim/interim orders, if any granted earlier, to continue subject to removal of office objections within two weeks; affidavits in reply/rejoinder, if any, to be filed before the next date.