Naveen Pokala and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Paucity-of-time adjournment and listing order, Bombay High Court, Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction, dated 21.01.2025 (Ghuge & Patil, JJ.). Board matters at Serial Nos. 31 to 123 (per chart) deferred to February 2025 dates; office objections to be removed within two weeks; interim orders, if any, to continue; reply/rejoinder affidavits to be filed before the next date. Procedural/postponement context only; no holdings, statutes or precedents recorded.
What did the court decide?
Matters could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time and were adjourned: office objections to be removed within two weeks; ad-interim/interim orders, if any granted earlier, to continue subject to such compliance; affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, to be filed before the next date; matters listed on 04.02.2025, 05.02.2025, 06.02.2025, 12.02.2025, 13.02.2025, 25.02.2025 and 26.02.2025 under Fresh Admission, Urgent Admission, Urgent Orders and Due Admission categories.