Uttam Rajaram Kamble v. the Food Corporation of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Listing order only: matters could not be heard for paucity of time; office objections to be removed within two weeks, interim orders continue subject to compliance, pleadings to be filed before next date, and matters listed on dates given. No substantive decision.
What the court decided
Digitally signed by TRUPTI TRUPTI SADANAND SADANAND BAMNE BAMNE Date: 2024.10.18 12:33:51 +0530
Trupti .. 1 .. common order 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
DATE :- 15TH OCTOBER, 2024
Per Court :-
- At the time of rising at 5.45 pm, the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.
- In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks.
- Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order,
if any granted earlier, would continue.
- The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed
before the next date.
Coram
M.M. Sathaye
Ravindra V. Ghuge
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Salim Akbar Lalani Solp Prop. Jyoti Builders and Developers vs the State of Maharashtra Throu. Its Sec. Tribal Development Dept and Ors.
Sachin Gorakshanath Kokane vs The State of Maharashatra
Akshay Sukhadeo Takale vs the Chief Executive Officer and Anr.
Balu S/O Rama Patil and Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra Throu. Its Deputy Sec. School Education and Sports Dept and Ors.