Sachin Gorakshanath Kokane v. The State of Maharashatra
Bombay HCWP/3936/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Administrative listing order recording that certain matters could not be heard due to paucity of time, directing removal of office objections within two weeks and continuation of interim orders, and fixing dates for listing.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Talwalkar .. 1 .. common order 2
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶3
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.
¶4
DATE :- 12TH NOVEMBER, 2024
¶5
Per Court :-
¶6
- At the time of rising at 5.45 pm, the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.
¶7
- In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks.
¶8
- Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue.
¶9
- The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed
¶10
before the next date.
¶11
- Subject to the above, list these matters as under:-
Coram
AI extract
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
ASHWIN D. BHOBE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Ajit Shankar Dhirde vs State of Maharashtra through the Secretary Education Department (Secondary)
Prakash Dattatraya Chougule vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Prashant Bajirao Mhasavekar vs the State of Maharashtra Throu. the Sec. School Education and Sports Dept and Ors.
Sunita Ajit Subhedar vs State of Maharashtra