Chandrakant Arjun Londhe v. State of Maha. Thr. Sec. and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Administrative common order listing multiple matters that could not be heard due to paucity of time; office objections to be removed within two weeks and interim orders to continue until the next dates.
What the court decided
Nikita .. 1 .. COMMON ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
& ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.
NIKITAKAILASDARADE Digitallysigned byNIKITAKAILASDARADEDate:2024.12.2016:00:40+0530
DATE :- 19th DECEMBER, 2024
Per Court :-
- At the time of rising, the matters mentioned in the chart in
paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.
- In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks.
- Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue.
- The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed
Coram
Ravindra V. Ghuge
Ashwin D. Bhobe
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Hemali Janardan Desale and Anr. vs the State of Maharashtra Thr the Secretary School Education Department and Ors.
Sham Arjun Rahere vs the Chief Executive Officer Zilla Parishad Kolhapur and Ors.
Akshay Sukhadeo Takale vs the Chief Executive Officer and Anr.
Manisha Nimesh Mehta vs Technology Development Board through Its Director