Prashant Sham Gaikwad v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal writ petition stood over to 2nd July 2024 at the request of respondent No.2's advocate, to be listed for settlement. No substantive orders were passed.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ssm 9-wp678.2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 678 OF 2024
Prashant Sham Gaikwad …..Petitioner
Vs.
The State Of Maharashtra & Anr. …..Respondents
Mr. Raju Suryawanshi for the Petitioner. Mr. V. A. Kulkarni APP, for the Respondent-State. Adv. Ajinkya Taskar for the Respondent No.2.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATE : 25th JUNE, 2024.
P.C.:-
- At the request of learned Advocate for the Respondent No.2, stand over to 2nd July, 2024.
- To be listed under the caption “for settlement” .
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Prashant Sham Gaikwad
- respondent
The State Of Maharashtra
- respondent
Respondent No.2
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court