MD Asad MD Irshad Siddique v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought quashing of an FIR partly, with informant's consent, without impleading the other two accused. The court considered the mode of such partial quashing legally not maintainable as debatable, and adjourned the petition to enable counsel to take instructions from the other accused.
What the court decided
H. C. Shiv 30.w1877.24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1877 OF 2024
Md. Asad Md Irshad Siddique .. Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents
Mr. Harshvardhan Suryavanshi for the Petitioner. Mr. Ajay Patil APP for the Respondent-State. Mr. S. R. Gupta for the Respondent No.2.
CORAM: A. S. GADKARI AND
SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ.
DATE : 9th MAY 2024
P. C.:-
- Whether the F.I.R. can be quashed with consent of the
informant qua the Petitioner (Accused No.3) i.e. in part, without impleading other two accused persons as the Petitioners is a debatable issue. According to us, such mode of quashing the crime partly by consent is legally not maintainable.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an FIR can be quashed in part, qua one accused by consent of the informant, without impleading the other two accused persons.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Md. Asad Md Irshad Siddique
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
- respondent
Respondent No.2
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court