Aman Altaf Patel v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Two criminal writ petitions seeking quashing were taken on board. The APP stated an additional injured person's statement had been recorded and proceedings cannot be quashed without consent of complainant and injured persons.
What the court decided
512-WP-355-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 355 OF 2024
Aman Altaf Patel ...Petitioner Versus
The State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ...Respondents
WITH
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4168 OF 2023
Samad Aslam Solanki ...Petitioner Versus State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ...Respondents
Ms. Disha Solanki, Advocate for the Petitioner in W.P. No.335/2024. Mr. Amresh Sharma, Advocate for the Petitioner in W.P. No.4168/2023. Ms. Sangita E. Phad, APP for the Respondent – State. Mr. Yogesh Hari Jare, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, & N. R. BORKAR, JJ. DATE : 28th MARCH, 2024.
P.C.:
- Not on board. Taken on board.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Aman Altaf Patel
- respondent
The State Of Maharashtra
- petitioner
Samad Aslam Solanki
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court