This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 566 OF 2024
Vikas Pawar
.Petitioner
Versus The Additional Collector and Appellate Authority, Churchgate, Mumbai & Ors.
.Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION (L.) NO. 15969 OF 2024
Vikas Pawar .Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .Respondents
Mr. Vishwajit N. Sagare, Advocate, for the Petitioner in both petitions. Ms. Rita Joshi and Ms. Varsha Sawant, AGPs, for the RespondentState in both Petitions.
CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATE: 01.07.2024
P. C.:
learned Single Judge (Coram: Sandeep V. Marne, J.) by Order dated 02.02.2024 passed in W.P. (L.) No.3386 of 2024 i.e. Writ Petition No. 566 of 2024. Accordingly, Writ Petition No.566 of 2024 is wrongly on
board and removed from the board.
Page No. 1
Anand
alternate efficacious remedy available under Section 35(1A)(a) of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 of filing an Appeal before the Grievance Redressal Committee (“GRC”).
to be withdrawn and disposed of as such with liberty as aforesaid.
the Petition and all contentions on merits are expressly kept open.
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
Page No. 2
Anand
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be withdrawn in view of the alternate remedy of appeal before the Grievance Redressal Committee under Section 35(1A)(a).
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vikas Pawar
The Additional Collector and Appellate Authority, Churchgate, Mumbai
The State of Maharashtra
Madhav J. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
