Hdfc Bank Ltd. v. the Dy Commissioner of Labour Kamgar Bhavan
Case brief
What is this about?
Procedural order only: the court discharged the Legal Services Committee-appointed counsel for Respondent No.2, who alleged harassment by the client, and directed the Committee to take appropriate steps; matter adjourned.
What the court decided
22 WP 2539.24.doc
BHALCHANDRA GOPAL DUSANE
Digitally signed by BHALCHANDRA GOPAL DUSANE Date: 2024.06.15 14:24:28 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2539 OF 2024
HDFC Bank Limited ...Petitioner
Versus
The Dy. Commissioner of Labour & Anr.
...Respondents
Mr. Satyadev R. Pandey, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. Suraj Gute, AGP for Respondent No.1.
Ms. Samiksha Kanani, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 14th June 2024
P. C.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
HDFC Bank Limited
- respondent
The Dy. Commissioner of Labour
- respondent
Respondent No.2 (unnamed)
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
27 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court