Two public interest litigation petitions concerning a development and construction tender and related environmental and biodiversity concerns were taken up together. Necessary party-respondents were directed to be impleaded, affidavits-in-reply and rejoinders were scheduled, and the matters were listed for further hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2-PIL-22-2024 +
Pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 22 OF 2024
Zoru Darayus Bhathena .. Petitioner
Versus
Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation & Ors. .. Respondents
WITH
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (L) NO.8224 OF 2024 Bandra Reclamation Area Volunteers Organization .. Petitioner
Versus Union of India & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Tushad Kakalia i/by Pushpa Thappar for petitioner in PIL/22/2024.
Ms. Ronita Bhattacharya Bector a/w Taiyaba Kazi i/by Amar Gharte for petitioner in PILL/8224/2024.
Dr. Milind Sathe, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Bhushan Deshmukh, Ms. Aarushi Yadav, Ms. Anushka Sharma for respondent no.1 – MSRDC in PIL/22/2024.
Mr. S. K. Mishra, Senior Advocate i/by Ms. Jaya Bagwe for respondent no.2-MCZMA in PIL/22/2024.
Mrs. Shehnaz V. Bharucha for respondent no.1 in PILL/8224/2024.
Mr. Milind More, Addl. Govt. Pleader for respondent no.3 in PIL/22/2024 and for respondent no.2 in PILL/8224/2024.
Mr. Zal Andhyarujina, Senior Advocate and Mr. Karan Bhide a/w Mrs. Rati Patni, Mrs. Kathleen Lobo and Mr. Vikrant Dere i/by Wadia Ghandy & Co. for Interveners (Adani Developer Pvt. Ltd.) in PIL/22/2024 and PILL/8224/2024.
1
2-PIL-22-2024 +
CORAM: DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. & AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATE: 5th SEPTEMBER, 2024
P.C.:
1. Since the subject matter of challenge in both these PIL petitions is intertwined, we propose to proceed with both the matters simultaneously.
2. In Public Interest Litigation No. 22 of 2024, Union of India, Municipal Corporation concerned and the party in whose favour tender has been allotted for taking up development and construction, have not been impleaded as party-respondents.
3. We, accordingly, direct that Union of India through the Ministry of Environment and Forest, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and the party in whose favour the subject tender has been allotted shall be impleaded as partyrespondents. Mr. Zal Andhyarujina, learned senior counsel, has put in appearance on behalf of party in whose favour the subject tender has been allotted.
4. Necessary amendment shall be incorporated by the learned counsel for the petitioner within a week. Reverification is dispensed with.
5. In Public Interest Litigation (L) No. 8224 of 2024, the Municipal Corporation concerned, Maharashtra Coastal Zone Management Authority and the party in whose favour certain tender relating to development and construction has been allotted, on whose behalf Mr. Zal Andhyarujina, learned senior
2
2-PIL-22-2024 +
counsel, has put in appearance, have not been impleaded as party-respondents, though they are necessary parties.
6. Accordingly, we direct that the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, Maharashtra Coastal Zone Management Authority and the party in whose favour tender has been allotted shall be impleaded as party respondents. Mr. Zal Andhyarujina, learned senior counsel, has put in appearance on behalf of party in whose favour the subject tender has been allotted.
7. Necessary amendments shall be incorporated by the learned counsel for the petitioner within a week. Reverification is dispensed with.
8. Since we propose to proceed with both the matters together, respondents are called upon to file their respective affidavits-in-reply in PIL No. 22 of 2024 within four weeks, however, while filing their affidavits, the respondents shall respond to the paragraphwise averments made in both the PIL petitions in addition to stating other pleas which may be available to them.
9. The rejoinder-affidavits to such affidavits-in-reply shall be filed by the petitioners within two weeks thereafter.
10. Stand over to 24th October, 2024 . To be listed High on Board.
11. Since a vital issue relating to environmental protection and ecology in the area, as also the biodiversity, is involved, we request the learned Additional Solicitor General of India to seek complete instructions and accordingly file the affidavit on behalf of the Union of India as directed above.
3
2-PIL-22-2024 +
12. Our request to the learned Additional Solicitor General shall be communicated forthwith by Mrs. Bharucha, learned counsel, who appears for Union of India in PIL(L) No. 8224 of 2024.
13. Learned counsel for the petitioner in PIL(L) No. 8224 of 2024 seeks liberty to file an affidavit for bringing certain documents on record.
14. Leave for filing said affidavit is granted. The affidavit may be filed within a week after serving a copy thereof upon the learned counsel representing the respondents.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
Digitally signed by PRAVIN PRAVIN DASHARATH DASHARATH PANDIT PANDIT Date: 2024.09.05 15:07:03 +0530
4
Zoru Darayus Bhathena
Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation
Bandra Reclamation Area Volunteers Organization
Union of India
Adani Developer Pvt. Ltd.
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Amit Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
