Ceat Limited v. Richard Dsouza
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Judicature at Bombay listed multiple connected writ petitions filed by Ceat Ltd. Against various respondents. The order is an interim listing order without substantive adjudication on the merits of the petitions.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-47
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2521 OF 2024
Ceat Ltd. ....PETITIONER V/S Ashok Chintaman Sakpal ....RESPONDENT
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 4751 OF 2024
Ceat Limited ....PETITIONER V/S Rajesh Bhailal Thakur ....RESPONDENT
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 1550 OF 2024
Ceat Limited ....PETITIONER V/S Nehru Mitharam Rajbhar ....RESPONDENT
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 4997 OF 2024
Ceat Limited ....PETITIONER V/S Manoj Ravji Surve ....RESPONDENT
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ceat Ltd.
- respondent
Ashok Chintaman Sakpal
- respondent
Rajesh Bhailal Thakur
- respondent
Nehru Mitharam Rajbhar
- respondent
Manoj Ravji Surve
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court