Chandrakant Shinde v. the Chairman Maharashtra Gramin Bank and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition concerning the petitioner and Maharashtra Gramin Bank was adjourned as counsel for the petitioner was in difficulty; no substantive matter was decided.
What the court decided
49-WP-1929-2024.doc
Vaibhav
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1929 OF 2024
Chandrakant T. Shinde …Petitioner Versus The Chairman, Maharashtra Gramin Bank and Anr. …Respondents
Mr. Yash S. Naik, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Dattaram Bile a/w Mr. Hrishikesh Nabar i/b Ms. Gargi Warunjikar for Respondent No. 1 & 2.
CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED: 2nd DECEMBER 2024
P.C.:
1. As the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner is in difficulty
stand over to 20th January 2025.
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Chandrakant T. Shinde
- respondent
The Chairman, Maharashtra Gramin Bank
Coram
Madhav J. Jamdar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
16 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court