Writ petition by Ruby Builders against State of Maharashtra and others; the court merely adjourned the matter to 13 August 2024 with ad interim relief continuing till the next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14-WP-1815-2024.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1815 OF 2024
Ruby Builders …Petitioner A Partnership Firm, through its Partner, Mr. Mahasukhlal Manila Shah Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondents
Mr. Nitin Thakkar, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. P. G. Lad and Ms. Sayali Apte, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar a/w. Ms. Dhawani Bokaria, Advocates, i/b. M/s. Purnanand & Co., for the Respondent No.4 Mr. Vishal Thadani, Addl.G.P., a/w. Mr. Suraj Gupte, AGP, for the Respondent Nos.1, 2, 3 and 5.
CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 5th AUGUST 2024
P. C.:
board.
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
Page 1 of 1
Sonali
Ruby Builders, a Partnership Firm, through its Partner, Mr. Mahasukhlal Manila Shah
State of Maharashtra
Respondent No.4
Madhav J. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
