Sunita Sunil Inchanalkar v. Shailesh Arvind Potdar and Anr.
Bombay HCWP/3728/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Plaintiff challenged a District Court order in writ petition; respondent's counsel sought time to file vakalatnama and affidavit-in-reply. Matter adjourned to 01.04.2024 without deciding anything.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
19.wp.3728.24.doc
¶2
Ajay
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
¶4
WRIT PETITION NO. 3728 OF 2024
¶5
Sunita Sunil Inchnalkar .. Petitioner
¶6
Versus
¶7
Shailesh Arvind Potdar and Anr.
¶8
.. Respondents
¶9
- Mr. Prashant S. Bhavake, Advocate for Petitioner.
¶10
- Ms. Pallavi A. Karanjkar, Advocate h/f. Mr. Sandeep Koregave, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
¶11
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : MARCH 18, 2024.
¶12
P.C.:
¶13
1. Heard Mr. Bhavake, learned Advocate for Petitioner and Ms.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Sunita Sunil Inchnalkar
- respondent
Shailesh Arvind Potdar
Coram
AI extract
Milind N. Jadhav
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Nazarali Nazar Husain Sayyed @ Sahil @Datta vs State of Maharashtra
Union of India through the Secretary and Ors. Vs Mumbai Shramik Sangh Adn Ors.
Mrs. Mujawar Munera Abul and Anr. Vs the Circle Officer Kabnoor and Ors.
Balasaheb Pandharinath Thorat Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Principal Secretary and Ors.