Writ petition challenging an order passed under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code; the court noted the availability of revision under Section 257 and disposed of the petition, keeping all contentions open for raising before the statutory authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7-wp-4283-2024.doc
Nikita
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.4283 OF 2024
NIKITA KAILAS
DARADE
Digitally signed byNIKITA KAILASDARADE Date: 2024.04.0117:34:51 +0530
Balasaheb Pandharinath Thorat… Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra Through Its
Principal Secretary and Ors.… Respondents
Mr. M. Mujeebuddin M. Choudhari, for the Petitioner
(thourhg V. C.)
Mr. S. L. Babar, AGP for the State.
CORAM:AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED:APRIL 1, 2024
P.C.:
1.The order impugned has been passed by authorities in
exercise of power under Section 247 of the Maharashtra Land
Revenue Code, 1966. The petitioner has remedy of revision under
Section 257. By keeping all contentions open for raising it before
the Statutory Authority. The writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
1
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Balasaheb Pandharinath Thorat
The State of Maharashtra Through Its Principal Secretary
Amit Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court