Nazarali Nazar Husain Sayyed @ Sahil @Datta v. State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCBA/461/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Bail application stood over for paucity of time; interim orders, if any, continued until the next date.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Board Sr.No.:-0
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
¶3
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 461 OF 2024
¶4
Nazarali Nazar Husain Sayyed @ Sahil @datta ....APPLICANT V/S
¶5
State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT
¶6
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE J DATE : 13th November, 2024
¶7
P.C. :
¶8
Due to paucity of time, stand over to 05/12/2024. Interim order, if any, to continue till then.
¶9
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
¶10
Page 1/1
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Nazarali Nazar Husain Sayyed @ Sahil @datta
- respondent
State Of Maharashtra
Coram
AI extract
Manish Pitale
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
15 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court