Laxman B Utale v. Breach Candy Swimming Bath Trust
Case brief
What is this about?
Twelve writ petitions by employees of Breach Candy Swimming Bath Trust were adjourned after counsel stated the parties are exploring an amicable settlement; the court listed them for further hearing.
What the court decided
- WP 828-2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 828 OF 2023
Vilas R. Agre .Petitioner Versus Breach Candy Swimming Bath Trust .Respondent
WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 6555 OF 2023
Nilesh R. Gawde
.Petitioner
Versus Breach Candy Swimming Bath Trust .Respondent
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1865 OF 2024
Falguni Jagdish Solanki .Petitioner Versus Breach Candy Swimming Bath Trust .Respondent
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1592 OF 2023
Nagraj Prakash Guddam .Petitioner Versus Breach Candy Swimming Bath Trust .Respondent
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vilas R. Agre
- petitioner
Nilesh R. Gawde
- petitioner
Falguni Jagdish Solanki
- petitioner
Nagraj Prakash Guddam
- petitioner
Ravindra R. Sawant
- petitioner
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
23 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court