Petitioner sought to challenge proceedings in a Sessions Case; as charge had been framed, counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to contest the trial, which the court granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Gitalaxmi 15-WP-1839-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1839 OF 2024
Mr. Neel Sureshbhai Mehta …Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …Respondents
Mr. Laxmikant Shukla a/w Ms. Asha Joshi for the Petitioner. Mr. Vinod Chate, APP for the Respondent-State. Ms. Aarti R. Dharamsey for Respondent No. 2 (through VC).
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATE : 18th JUNE 2024
P.C.:-
2018 arising out of C. R. No. 202 of 2016 registered with Ghatkopar
Police Station, Mumbai.
Leave and liberty granted.
Petition on the motion of learned counsel for the Petitioner, as recorded above and has not considered the merits involved in the Petition.
(DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.)
Digitally signed GITALAXMIKRISHNA by GITALAXMIKRISHNAKOTAWADEKAR KOTAWADEKAR Date: 2024.06.25 10:19:54 +0530
1/1
Neel Sureshbhai Mehta
The State of Maharashtra
A. S. Gadkari
Dr. Neela Gokhale
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
