5 Mr. Walawalkar, the learned counsel appearing for Respondents/ original Plaintiffs is at pains to point out absolute absurdity in the applications for amendment of Written Statement contending that the same are aimed solely at delaying the decision of the Appeals. Mr. Thorat, the learned counsel appearing for Petitioners points out that decrees have already been executed and possession of the suit premises is with Plaintiffs and therefore delay in decision of Appeals does not enure to the benefit of the Petitioners. Be that as it may. If the Appellate Bench ultimately arise at conclusion that filing of applications for amendment of Written Statement is abuse of process of law, the Appellate Bench is vested with power to impose exemplary costs on the Petitioners. However this Court cannot be urged to go into the merits of the said applications and to conduct an enquiry as to whether the amendments sought to be introduced by the Petitioners are worth allowing or not. This is something which the Appellate Bench will have to consider and decide.