Rohit Thakarshi Pipalia v. Mita Rohit Pipalia and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Husband's criminal revision application challenging a Family Court maintenance order. The court required the applicant to deposit Rs.36,000/- towards outstanding interim maintenance to his wife's account as proof of bona fides, granted ad-interim stay of execution subject to that deposit, and issued notice returnable on 17 April 2024.
What did the court decide?
Ad-interim stay of execution/implementation of Family Court order dated 14.05.2018 in Petition No. E-206 of 2013, conditional on deposit of Rs.36,000/- with the respondent wife; notice returnable 17 A
What the court decided
KVM
1/3
909 - CRI REVN 152 OF 2024.doc
KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR
Digitally signed by KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR Date: 2024.03.21 11:52:26 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRI. REVISION APPLICATION NO. 152 of 2024
Rohit Thakarshi Pipalia
….. Applicant
VERSUS
Mita Rohit Pipalia & Anr. ….. Respondents
Mr.Rajaram Bansode a/w. Kiran Nikam for the Applicant. Mr.Swapnil S.Pednekar, A.P.P. for the State – Respondent No.2.
CORAM: RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the execution and operation of the Family Court's maintenance judgment should be stayed pending hearing of the criminal revision application.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Rohit Thakarshi Pipalia
- respondent
Mita Rohit Pipalia
- respondent
State
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
30 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court