Atul Prakash Kalkutaki v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The bail application was allowed to be withdrawn by the applicant after the Court expressed no inclination to grant bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
510 BA 1693.24.doc Dusane
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.1693 OF 2024
Atul Prakash Kalkutaki …Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …Respondents
Ms. Ahilya T. Nalawade (through VC) alongwith Mr. Anshuman Deshmukh for Applicant
Ms. Savita M. Yadav, APP for Respondent-State.
CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 26th April 2024
P.C. :
Ms. Yadav, learned APP.
(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.)
1/1
Atul Prakash Kalkutaki
The State of Maharashtra
MADHAV J. JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court