Vijay @ Gadu Major Bhosale v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Applicant in custody since 2015 sought bail citing prolonged incarceration; a prior bail application had been rejected on merits in 2017, so bail was not reconsidered. The Trial Court was requested to conclude the trial and pronounce judgment by 30 June 2024, with liberty to reapply if it failed.
What did the court decide?
Trial Court requested to pronounce judgment by 30 June 2024; applicant free to file fresh bail application if trial not concluded.
What the court decided
503-BA-1689-2024.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1689 OF 2024
Vijay @ Gadu Major Bhosale …Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra …Respondent
Mr. Ashraf Ali Akhtar Shaikh (through Video Conference), Advocate, for the Applicant.
Mr. Prasanna P. Malshe, APP, for the Respondent-State.
Mr. Atul Khandare, P.S.I., Saswad Police Station, Pune, present.
CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 26th APRIL 2024
PC:-
1. Heard Mr. Shaikh, learned Counsel for the Applicant and Mr.
Malshe, learned APP for the Respondent-State.
- Mr. Shaikh, learned Counsel for the Applicant states that the Applicant is incarcerated since 18th October 2015 and therefore, this is a case of prolonged incarceration.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Should bail be granted to an applicant facing prolonged incarceration while the trial is at its fag end?
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Vijay @ Gadu Major Bhosale
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
Madhav J. Jamdar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court