Digambar Alias Rakesh Gopal Nalawade v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim application in a pending criminal appeal; the State reported respondent no.2 did not wish to participate, she was treated as served, and the matter was adjourned to the next date. No substantive issue decided.
What the court decided
1 / 1 36-IA-2161-24-IN-APEAL-569-24
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2161 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.569 OF 2024
Digambar @ Rakesh Gopal Nalawade .... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .... Respondents
- Ms. Rukhsana Khan i/b. Abdul R. Shaikh, Advocate for Applicant.
- Mr. Shrikant H. Yadav, APP for the State/Respondent.
CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. DATE : 12th AUGUST, 2024
P.C. :
- Learned APP submitted that the Respondent No.2 is
served and she has stated that she does not want to take part in this Appeal and the application.
- Considering this statement, the office shall treat the Respondent No.2 as served. Both, this Application and the Appeal, shall proceed further.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Digambar @ Rakesh Gopal Nalawade
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
- respondent
Respondent No.2 (unnamed)
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court