Disposed

Divisional Controller Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (Msrtc) v. Balu Laxman Bhosale and Anr.

Bombay HC9 Jul 2024IA/10047/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Registrar granted a final two-week opportunity to the applicant's advocate to supply copies for issuing notices to respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in interim applications, failing which they would stand dismissed automatically without further reference.

What did the court decide?

Two further weeks to supply copies; automatic dismissal on failure; ten-week extension of notice returnable date if supplied.

Divisional Controller Maharashtra State Road… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶2

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 10047 OF 2024 ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 10048 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 15135 OF 2024

¶3

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s order appearance, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders

¶4

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------CORAM : SHRI S. R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL -II)

¶5

DATE : 03/09/2024

¶6

None Present

¶7

The above numbered Interim Applications are listed for second time on the Board of Registrar for supplying copies. Already 02 weeks time was granted. However, despite of granting 02 weeks time, the Advocate for the Applicant has not supplied copies for issuing Notices to respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

¶8

In view of provisions under Chapter VII, Rule 2 (iii) of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 matters to be dismissed for non-prosecution in case of default of payment of process fess and failure to supply copies – Immediately after the expiry of the time prescribed in the foregoing sub-rules of this rule for the supply of copies, the Office shall place before the Registrar all such matters in which the process fees have not been paid and/or the copies have not been supplied within the prescribed time, and the Registrar shall dismiss all such matters for failure to prosecute. As such, the prescribed time to supply copies, as provided under Rules,1960 has been expired. 02

¶9

weeks time was granted, but all in vain. The matter is lying ideally without any progress as learned Advocate for the Applicant has not taken any steps. However, instead of passing order of dismissal outrightly, it would be just and proper to give one more opportunity to supply the necessary copies.

¶10

In turn, two weeks time is granted with directions to supply necessary copies without fail. On failure, the Interim Applications would stand dismissed against respondent Nos. 1 and 2 without further reference to the Court of Registrar. If copies supplied, notice returnable date be extended for ten weeks.

¶11

Sd/REGISTRAR (JUDL-II)

¶12

sat-R(J-II)-03.09.2024

Divisional Controller Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (Msrtc) v. Balu Laxman Bhosale and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Divisional Controller Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (Msrtc) v. Balu Laxman Bhosale and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shri. Ramchandra Nagu Mhatre vs Shri. Narayan Gajanan Bhoir

Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd.., Kolhapur Thr.Branch Manager vs Masaibi Jibrail Shaikh and Ors.

Rohit @ Kachya Rajendra Kchare vs State of Maharashtra

Mukesh Radheshyam Soni vs State of Maharashtra

Mukesh Radheshyam Soni vs State of Maharashtra

Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd. vs Annasaheb Ganpat Gaikwad and Anr.