Bail application of one applicant was permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh bail application after recording evidence of some witnesses. The other bail application was adjourned to a later date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3-BA-585-2024 WITH CONT. MT..doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.585 OF 2024
Adil @ Shalu Ibrar Siddhiqui …. Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra …. Respondent
Digitally signed NILAM by NILAM SANTOSH SANTOSHKAMBLE KAMBLE Date: 2024.11.12 14:04:40 +0530
WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1149 OF 2024
Vijaylaxmi Shivprasad Upadhyay …. Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra …. Respondent
WITH BAIL APPLICATION NO.1595 OF 2024
Mukesh @ Lala SitaramNishad …. Applicant
V/s. The State of Maharashtra …. Respondent
Mr.Ravishankar D. Dwivedi a/w Mr.Satish Shukla, for the Applicant in BA No.585 of 2024.
Mr.Gaurav Bhawanani i/b Mr.Khan Abdul Wahab, for the Intervenor in IA No.1149 of 2024.
Mr.Sandip Karnik, for the Applicant in BA No.1595 of 2024 Mr.Prashant P. Jadhav, APP for the Respondent-State. Mr.Sandipan Tobare, PSI, Kherwadi Police Station.
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 11th NOVEMBER 2024
N.S. Kamble page 1 of 2
3-BA-585-2024 WITH CONT. MT..doc
P.C:-
BAIL APPLICATION NO.1595 OF 2024
APP for the Respondent-State.
Bail Application with liberty to file fresh Application after recording evidence of some witnesses.
Application is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.
BAIL APPLICATION NO.585 OF 2024
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
N.S. Kamble page 2 of 2
Adil @ Shalu Ibrar Siddhiqui
Vijaylaxmi Shivprasad Upadhyay
Mukesh @ Lala Sitaram Nishad
The State of Maharashtra
Shivkumar Dige
As recorded by the court registry
14 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
