First appeal filed with two interim applications. The court condoned a six-day delay in filing without opposition, allowed time to respondent No. 5 to file an affidavit in reply and rejoinder, and listed the matter for further hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 904-FA(ST)-32772-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.32772 OF 2024 WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.15280 OF 2024
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.15279 OF 2024
Neena Rajeev Rastogi (Neena Gokaldas Rathod) … Appellant V/s. Narmada Gokaldas Rathod & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Simil Purohi, Senior Advocate a/w Gaurav Jangle, Mithilesh Chalke and Nidhi Mistry i/b I. V. Marchant Co. for Applicant/Appellant. Mr. Piyush Shah a/w Dishang Shah for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Shailesh Shah, Senior Advocate i/b Ketan Chothani for Respondent No.5.
CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 13th DECEMBER 2024
P.C. :
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.15279 OF 2024:
this. In any view of the matter, the delay is only of 6 days. Hence, the Interim Application is allowed and the delay of 6 days is condoned.
1 of 2
Ajit
2 904-FA(ST)-32772-2024.doc
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.15280 OF 2024:
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)
2 of 2
Ajit
Neena Rajeev Rastogi (Neena Gokaldas Rathod)
Narmada Gokaldas Rathod
Respondent No. 5
Arif S. Doctor
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
