Vir Krishna Kotak v. Hl Terminal Holding B.V.
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim application listed to enable parties to file written submissions in a suit concerning injunction against coparceners dealing with HUF properties. Defendants sought to rely on additional judgments; the court granted time and adjourned.
What the court decided
906-IA-512-2024.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 512 OF 2024
IN
SUIT NO. 53 OF 2024
Vir Krishnan Kotak …Applicant IN THE MATTER BETWEEN Vir Krishnan Kotak ...Plaintiff
Versus
SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE
Digitally signed by SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE Date: 2024.12.23 11:15:46 +0530
HI Terminal Holding BV & Ors
…Defendants
Mr Gyanendra Kumar, Senior Advocate , with Ajay Sawhney, Shree Sinha, Priyanka Desai & Shivam Tiwari, i/b Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, for the Applicant/Plaintiff.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Vir Krishnan Kotak
- petitioner
Vir Krishnan Kotak
- respondent
HI Terminal Holding BV & Ors
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
31 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Vir Krishna Kotak vs Hl Terminal Holding B.V.
Sharad Damodar Chitnis vs Shamim Firoz Ramodiya
Tata Capital Financial Services Limited vs International Print O Pac
District Industries Centre Department of Industries Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu vs the Official Liquidator Parsurampuria Industries Lid