interim application; petitioner raised grievance regarding service of application; caveator submitted service could not be effected; counsel for petitioner sought time for instructions; matter stood over for next date. no substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
26-IA-3345-2024 IN CTSL-257-2018.DOC
Arun Sankpal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3345 OF 2024
IN
CAVEAT (L) NO. 257 OF 2018 IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 1574 OF 2028
Bharti Prabhatkumar Patil & Anr ...Applicants/ Caveators In the matter between Mangesh Kesarinath Mhatre ...Petitioner Kesarinath Dharamaji Mhatre …Deceased
Ms. Chitrangada Singh, with Ms. Nehal Gaikwad, i/b Clove Legal, for the Applicant in IA/3345/2024.
Mr. P. A. Narayanan, i/b Neeta Parikh, for the Petitioner.
CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED : 10 DECEMBER 2024
P.C.:
ARUN RAMCHANDRA SANKPAL
Digitally signed by ARUN RAMCHANDRA SANKPAL Date: 2024.12.11 11:10:54 +0530
1/2
26-IA-3345-2024 IN CTSL-257-2018.DOC
instructions.
2/2
Bharti Prabhatkumar Patil & Anr
Mangesh Kesarinath Mhatre
N. J. Jamadar
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
