In a second appeal and connected civil application, the High Court of Bombay allowed the application to con 18 days' delay and restore Second Appeal No.613 of 2002 on unspecified reasons.
Condon the delay of 18 days and restore Second Appeal No.613 of 2002.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chitra Sonawane 1 48-CA-1364-2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Second Appeal No.613 of 2002
a/w
Civil Application No.1364 of 2019
In
Second Appeal No.613 of 2002
Bhagwandas Chetandas Mulchandani… Appellant.
Vs.
Lalchand Ramchand Khatri & Ors.… Respondents.
Mr Sanjay Kshirsagar for appellant.
Coram: R. N. Laddha, J.
Date : 4 March 2024.
P.C. :-
: Civil Application No.1364 of 2019
For the reasons stated in the application and no
objection from other side, the application is allowed in terms
of prayer (A) and (B) which read thus:-
"A) That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to restore
the Second Appeal No.613 of 2002.
B) That the delay of 18 days may be condoned in
filing present civil application."
Chitra Sonawane 2 48-CA-1364-2019.doc
Second Appeal No.613 of 2002:
Issue notice to the respondents returnable on 16 April
2024.
[R. N. Laddha, J. ]
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the civil application is condonable.
Whether the second appeal should be restored.
Bhagwandas Chetandas Mulchandani
Lalchand Ramchand Khatri
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court