The High Court of Bombay concurred in the request to condone a 135-day delay in filing appeals. The interim application was disposed of, and notices were issued for the main appeals.
The delay of 135 days was condoned and notices were issued for the appeals.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SMITAJOHNSON Digitally signed by SMITAJOHNSON GONSALVESDate: 2024.03.02 14:38:53 GONSALVES +0530
20.ia1978-24.doc
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1978 OF 2024 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.181 OF 2024 WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.181 OF 2024
Ramaben Mansukhlal Sachaniya ...Applicant
vs. Raju Maliram Saini And Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. Anuj G. Pande, a/w. Yogesh Vora, for the Applicant.
CORAM : R.N. LADDHA, J.
DATE : 1 MARCH 2024
P.C. :
Interim Application No.1978 of 2024
1 / 2
20.ia1978-24.doc
sg
Appeal from Order No.181 of 2024
2024 .
(R.N. LADDHA, J.)
2 / 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone a delay of 135 days in filing an appeal and dispose of the interim application.
Ramaben Mansukhlal Sachaniya
Raju Maliram Saini
R.N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court