The High Court at Bombay disposed of the anticipatory bail application as infructuous since the accused had already been acquitted by the Sessions Court in the underlying charges.
The application was dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mamta Kale
7-aba-779-2020.doc
MAMTAAMARKALE Digitally signed byMAMTA AMAR KALEDate: 2024.03.0418:06:53 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRI. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 779 OF 2020
Sayaji Rajaram Pawar ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent
None for the Applicant. Mr. Arfan Sait, APP for the Respondent – State. PSI S. R. Gore, Hadapsar Police Station, Pune City present.
CORAM : R. N. LADDHA, J. DATE : 4 MARCH 2024
P.C.
. Learned APP, on instructions, informs the Court that in the aforesaid crime, the accused has been acquitted by a judgment and order dated 15 November 2022 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Sessions Case No. 5/2021.
R. N. LADDHA, J.
page 1 of 1
Sayaji Rajaram Pawar
The State of Maharashtra
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
