The Applicant filed an anticipatory bail application. The Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor stated that the police filed a Final Report, rendering the application infructuous. The Court disposed of the application on this basis.
The anticipatory bail application stands disposed of as being infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mamta Kale
5-aba-595-2020.doc
MAMTAAMARKALE Digitally signed byMAMTA AMAR KALEDate: 2024.03.0418:06:54 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRI. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 595 OF 2020
Rupesh Dattatray Thakur ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents
Mr. Gaurav Parkar, for the Applicant. Ms. Shilpa Talhar, APP for the Respondent – State.
CORAM : R. N. LADDHA, J. DATE : 4 MARCH 2024
P.C.
. Learned APP, on instructions makes a statement that since the police has filed A-Summary report in this matter, nothing survives in this anticipatory bail application.
R. N. LADDHA, J.
page 1 of 1
Rupesh Dattatray Thakur
The State of Maharashtra
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
