Mangesh Shankar Kamble v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application hearing adjourned; leave granted to implead the victim as respondent and notice issued.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
33- BA 559 of 2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.559 OF 2024
Mangesh Shankar Kamble ...Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents
Mr. Nikhil Patil i/b. Ms. Sharmila K. Deshmukh, for the Applicant. (Appointed Advocate through Legal Aid)
Ms.Gauri Rao, APP, for the Respondent No.1/State.
CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATE : MARCH 26, 2024
P.C.:
- Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the State.
- The learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to amend the application so as to implead the victim as a party respondent.
- Leave granted. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mangesh Shankar Kamble
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
- respondent
Victim (Respondent No.2, to be impleaded)
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
18 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court