Sonu @ Rushikesh Dattu Jadhav v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
The application for anticipatory bail was disposed of as infructuous as the applicant had already been arrested, rendering the application unnecessary.
The application for anticipatory bail was disposed of as infructuous as the applicant had already been arrested, rendering the application unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
5-aba-452-2024.doc
Shabnoor
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.452 OF 2024
SHABNOORAYUBPATHAN Digitallysigned bySHABNOORAYUBPATHANDate:2024.03.2217:06:34+0530
Sonu @ Rushikesh Dattu Jadhav … Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. Vivek N. Arote, for Applicant. Mr. Pankaj P. Deokar, APP for State/Respondent.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : MARCH 22, 2024
P.C.:
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
1
SHABNOORAYUBPATHAN
The State of Maharashtra
AMIT BORKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court