The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed Writ Petition No. 386 of 2016 for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to substantiate the enforceable right claimed during hearing.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1-wp386-2016.doc
VRJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.386 OF 2016
VAIBHAV
RAMESH
JADHAV
Digitally signed byVAIBHAV RAMESHJADHAVDate: 2024.03.2710:36:48 +0530
Omprakash Wasuram Behal … Petitioner V/s. The Joint Registrar (CIDCO), Cooperative Societies, & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Vinod Sharma for the petitioner. Mr. S. D. Rayrikar, AGP for the State/respondent No.1.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : MARCH 26, 2024
P.C.:
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
1
Omprakash Wasuram Behal
The Joint Registrar (CIDCO), Cooperative Societies
Others
AMIT BORKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
