Three writ petitions challenging framing of a preliminary issue in complaints; during pendency the complaints were finally decided, rendering the petitions infructuous.
Petitions disposed of as infructuous; questions kept open; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
54-wp6153-2022.doc
VRJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.6153 OF 2022
VAIBHAVRAMESHJADHAV Digitallysigned byVAIBHAVRAMESHJADHAVDate:2024.02.0118:08:15+0530
Manugraph India Ltd. Unit 1, Through Its General Manager-HR & IR Kolhapur … Petitioner V/s.
Krishna Narayan Patil … Respondent
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.4796 OF 2022
Manugraph India Ltd. Unit 1, Through Its General Manager-HR & IR Kolhapur … Petitioner V/s.
Anandrao Shankarrao Nimbalkar … Respondent
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.6483 OF 2022
Manugraph India Ltd. Unit 2, Through Its General Manager-HR & IR Kolhapur … Petitioner V/s.
Mansing Ramrao Patil … Respondent
Mr. Sandip Mutalik with Mr. Sandeep Mahadik for the petitioner.
Mr. Sangramsinh Yadav for the respondent.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED : FEBRUARY 1, 2024
P.C.:
1
54-wp6153-2022.doc
however, during pendency of the writ petitions the complaint is finally decided. Therefore, the writ petitions are rendered infructuous.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
2
Manugraph India Ltd. Unit 1, Through Its General Manager-HR & IR Kolhapur
Krishna Narayan Patil
Manugraph India Ltd. Unit 1, Through Its General Manager-HR & IR Kolhapur
Anandrao Shankarrao Nimbalkar
Manugraph India Ltd. Unit 2, Through Its General Manager-HR & IR Kolhapur
Mansing Ramrao Patil
Amit Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
