Three writ petitions challenged framing of a preliminary issue in complaints; during pendency the complaints were finally decided. The High Court disposed of the petitions as infructuous, keeping the questions raised open, with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
54-wp6153-2022.doc
VRJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.6153 OF 2022
VAIBHAVRAMESHJADHAV Digitallysigned byVAIBHAVRAMESHJADHAVDate:2024.02.0118:08:15+0530
Manugraph India Ltd. Unit 1, Through Its General Manager-HR & IR Kolhapur … Petitioner V/s.
Krishna Narayan Patil … Respondent
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.4796 OF 2022
Manugraph India Ltd. Unit 1, Through Its General Manager-HR & IR Kolhapur … Petitioner V/s.
Anandrao Shankarrao Nimbalkar … Respondent
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.6483 OF 2022
Manugraph India Ltd. Unit 2, Through Its General Manager-HR & IR Kolhapur … Petitioner V/s.
Mansing Ramrao Patil … Respondent
Mr. Sandip Mutalik with Mr. Sandeep Mahadik for the petitioner.
Mr. Sangramsinh Yadav for the respondent.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED : FEBRUARY 1, 2024
P.C.:
1
54-wp6153-2022.doc
however, during pendency of the writ petitions the complaint is finally decided. Therefore, the writ petitions are rendered infructuous.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
2
Manugraph India Ltd. Unit 1, Through Its General Manager-HR & IR Kolhapur
Krishna Narayan Patil
Anandrao Shankarrao Nimbalkar
Manugraph India Ltd. Unit 2, Through Its General Manager-HR & IR Kolhapur
Mansing Ramrao Patil
Amit Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
