Aditya Avinash Sood v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Four criminal bail applications were adjourned due to paucity of time, with any interim orders continuing until the next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-30
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 3766 OF 2024
Shivani Vishal Agarwal ....APPLICANT V/S
The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT
WITH
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 3751 OF 2024
Ashpak Basha Makandar And Anr ....APPLICANT V/S
State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT
WITH
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 3809 OF 2024
Ajay Aniruddha Taware ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT
WITH
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 4172 OF 2024
Aditya Avinash Sood ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT
Page 1/2
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE J DATE : 9th December, 2024
P.C. :
Due to paucity of time, stand over to 09/01/2025. Interim order, if any, to continue till then.
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Page 2/2
Shivani Vishal Agarwal
Ashpak Basha Makandar
Ajay Aniruddha Taware
Aditya Avinash Sood
The State Of Maharashtra
Manish Pitale
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court