The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an order allowing legal representatives to be brought on record despite a delay of over four years, finding no perversity in the courts findings. The petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
918-wp-6183-24.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
Writ Petition (WP) No. 6183 of 2024
Jaikumar S/o Shaligram Chandak
Versus
Dipak S/o Shrikant Kachare and others
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order
Shri M.G.Sarda, Advocate for the petitioner.
CORAM : N.R.BORKAR, J. DATED : 15th OCTOBER, 2024.
This petition takes exception to the order
dated 18th September, 2024 passed by the learned Adhoc
District Judge-1, Khamgaon below Exhibit 12 in Regular Civil Appeal No. 59 of 2015.
SKNair
2 918-wp-6183-24.odt
respondent nos. 1 to 3 and 5 to 7 to bring on record the legal representatives of said Pramila Dedhe.
[N.R.BORKAR, J.]
SKNair
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the first appellate court's order allowing legal representatives to be brought on record after a delay of over four years?
Jaikumar S/o Shaligram Chandak
Dipak S/o Shrikant Kachare and others
N.R.Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
