Jaydeep Bharat Apte v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application listed but not heard due to paucity of time; the court adjourned the matter to the next day, directing that any interim order then in force continue until the adjourned date.
What did the court decide?
Adjourned to 12/11/2024; interim orders to continue till then.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-0
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 4319 OF 2024
Jaydeep Bharat Apte ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR J
DATE : 11th November, 2024
P.C. :
Due to paucity of time, stand over to 12/11/2024. Interim order, if any, to continue till then.
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Page 1/1
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Jaydeep Bharat Apte
- respondent
The State Of Maharashtra
Coram
Anil S. Kilor
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
The Chief Officer, Municipal Council, Mul, Chandrapur Vs Vinod S/O Arunrao Yenurkar and Others
Naresh S/O Chandumal Jotwani Vs Naresh S/O Sadashivrao Karwatkar and Anothe
Wine Corner, Amravati Thr. Proprietor, Shri. Vijay Kumar Gulabchand Bhamore and Anr. Vs State of Maha., Thr. the Principal Secy., Dept. of State Excise, Mumbai and Ors.
Shri. Rajesh Shyambhadur Singh and Another Vs Shri. Kiran Shantaya Chenaveni and Others