Suraj Anil Kale v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application adjourned after the victim sought legal aid; the High Court Legal Services Committee was directed to appoint a panel advocate for respondent No. 2.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
5-BA-3680-24.DOC
Sayali Upasani
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3680 OF 2024
Suraj Anil Kale ...Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others ...Respondents
Mr. Chinmay Patil with Mr. Amit Pardeshi, Advocate for Applicant. Mrs. G. P. Mulekar, APP for State-Respondent.
Mr. Vikas Janardan Panchmukh, Chikhali Police Station, Present.
CORAM:- ANIL S. KILOR, J.
DATED:- 11th DECEMBER, 2024
PC:-
- Learned APP points out that the intimation was given to the victim and she has requested to provide her legal aid.
- In that view of the matter, the High Court Legal Services Committee, Mumbai is directed to appoint an Advocate from its panel to represent and espouse the cause of the respondent No. 2.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Suraj Anil Kale
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
- respondent
Respondent No. 2
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Ms. Shila D/O. Ashok Naik Vs Maha. State Road Transport Corporation, Thr. Divisional Traffic Superintendent, Nagpur
Jaikumar S/O Shaligram Chandak Vs Dipak S/O Shrikant Kachare and Others
Tufan Singh S/O Ghanshyam Singh Chauhan vs Ghanshyam Singh S/O Jihbal Singh and Others
Jaydeep Bharat Apte vs the State of Maharashtra