Rahul Ramesh Pawar v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim order in a bail application permitting the applicant to add the Customs Department as respondent, with amendment within one week and notice to issue to the new respondent, returnable on 18 November 2024.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
913-BA-2849-24.DOC
Sayali Upasani
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2849 OF 2024
Rahul Ramesh Pawar ...Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr. Kamran Shaikh i/b Mr. Changdev Shingade, Advocate for Applicant.
Mr. S. S. Ghag, APP for State-Respondent.
CORAM:- ANIL S. KILOR, J.
DATED:- 10th OCTOBER, 2024
PC:-
- The learned Counsel for the applicant seeks permission to add Custom Department as Respondent.
- Permission is granted.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Rahul Ramesh Pawar
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
Anil S. Kilor
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Kishor S/O Baburaoji Bhute vs Prashant S/O Pundlikrao Bhende
Kashinath Sundraji Chaudhary vs Mahadeorao Tulsidas Mahalle and Others
Gautam S/O Damaji Tambe and Others vs Hemant S/O Raghunath Pikalmunde and Others
Smt. Mamata Wd/O Mahendrasingh Khutpale (Ku. Mamata D/O Gokulsingh Sengar) vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Ministry of Revenue, Mumbai and Others